Vela Docs vs HedgeDoc
HedgeDoc is the better choice when: your organization needs the document data to stay on your own servers for security, compliance, or data-residency reasons.
You have an ops team comfortable running a small Node / Postgres service and keeping it patched.
You want to extend or modify the editor itself. HedgeDoc is open source and accepts contributions; Vela Docs is closed source.
Vela Docs is the better choice when: the file came from an AI assistant and you need to share it with a colleague today, not after spinning up a VM.
You want the polished review flow (margin pins, threaded replies, mute links in emails) without configuring it.
Your collaborators include non-technical people who'd rather click a share-link than create yet another account. Vela Docs lets share-link viewers in without an account; HedgeDoc instances typically require sign-in.
Feature comparison
| Vela Docs | HedgeDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time co-editing | yes | yes |
| Inline comments on text range | yes | basicbasic |
| GitHub-flavored Markdown | yes | yes |
| Export to clean .md | yes | yes |
| Drop a .md file to open | yes | importimport |
| Self-hostable | no | yes |
| Open source | no | yes |
| Share-link viewers no account | yes | depends on instancedepends on instance |
| Local-first browser storage | yes | no |
| Managed infrastructure (no ops) | yes | no |
| Email notification for comments | yes | configurableconfigurable |
| MathJax / LaTeX rendering | no | yes |
Comparison reflects standard / free tiers as of 2026. HedgeDoc's feature set evolves; this page is updated when material differences change.
Common questions
Is HedgeDoc the same as HackMD?
Should I self-host HedgeDoc or use Vela Docs?
Can HedgeDoc collaborators leave inline comments?
Does HedgeDoc support real-time editing?
What's the cost comparison?
Can I migrate from HedgeDoc to Vela Docs (or vice versa)?
Related comparisons: